|
HOME BACK
January
25, 2007
It
has been over two weeks since the boyfriend of my niece’s
mother nearly ran me over with his car in front of my niece. It
was the first time in over two year’s that I attempted to
visit my 4 year-old niece or have any contact with her or the mother.
On Sunday January 7, 2007 Ashley Terjelian, the mother, demanded
that the visit between Larkin Forney and their daughter would be
at the Burger King on Shelburne Road in South Burlington, or there
would be no visit. (This would have been the first visit in over
a month.) I decided to go to Burger King because I am VERY concerned
about my niece and wanted to see her and make sure that she is ok.
Upon seeing me, Ashley immediately terminated the visit that my
brother had with his daughter—a court ordered visit. This
little girl is in danger. There is no reason for Ashley to have
reacted the way she did other than she does not like me having concerns
about or contact with my niece because she is trying to hide something
that is happening to/around my niece that is abusive. Shouldn’t
everyone have concerns about others—about how they are doing—especially
a child? And certainly having concerns about the care and treatment
of a child should not cause for that child’s “caretaker”
to want to harm or kill you.
Because of what happened on Sunday January 7, 2007, I am fearful
of the prolonged and escalating violence of Ashley Terjelian and
what might happen if swift, appropriate intervention is not taken.
I am concerned about the physical appearance of Ashley (Ashley had
dark brown circles around her eyes and has lost a large amount of
weight --over 70 lbs in less than two months—according to
her). I am concerned about the appearance of my niece (who has lost
the sparkle in her eyes-- is pale, sullen and withdrawn.) I actually
had not thought about it until now, but I never described to David
Elin (from DCF—Dept. of Children and Families)— how
my niece looked and I’m only just realizing that as I write
this. I described to him how the mother looked and her rapid weight
loss but I was never asked how “Molly” appeared.
For the majority of this violent incident, I was paying close attention
to Ashley because her behavior was irrational, violent and out of
control. In the few moments I had with my niece (upon first entering
BK), as she sat ready to eat with her father, I kneeled down to
her level, looked into her eyes and said “Hi “Molly”.
Do you remember me? Do you remember Aunt Kim?” and she looked
me in the eyes, thought for a second and then her eyes lit up and
she shook her head up and down and may have very softly spoken “yeah”.
Ashley said sternly, “Let’s go, “Molly”!”
“Molly” requested numerous times that she wanted to
stay, and that she wanted to eat and play with her friends. Ashley
ignored her. Ashley ignored my repeated question as to why she won’t
let me see my niece---or why she won’t let my niece see me---just
as she ignored the same question on March 10, 2005.
Why the situation this child is in has not IMMEDIATELY been investigated
thoroughly is beyond me. I also do not understand why someone is
not and has not been appointed to watch over this child’s
safety and welfare. “Molly’s” well-being and safety
is clearly not the mother’s priority. My brother has brought
forth his concerns (and evidence to support the concerns he has)
about the behavior exhibited by the mother (and others brought into
his daughter’s life by choice of the mother) and concerns
he has regarding his daughter’s behavior and other situations
that have occurred surrounding this little girl. And yet he has
been repeatedly ignored by the family court, Judge Crawford, and
DCF---those agencies, or persons in positions of power which are
supposed to help ensure the safety of a child. Ashley has not shown
up to the last two family court hearings and my brother has only
had 35 visits (1hr per week) out of over 60 that he should have
had with his daughter by now. He has expressed his desire to have
visits where Paul Terjelian (Ashley’s lying abusive father)
is not present, and his requests have been ignored. In December
2006, Larkin was attempting to visit with his daughter and Paul
was the only one present (which is a condition against the understanding
the court had with Ashley—someone else is supposed to be present
during the visits, besides Paul.) When Ashley lost custody of her
daughter during the first year of her life, temporary custody was
given to her parents, Lisa and Paul Terjelian, Lisa and Paul are
liars. Paul is an abuser. He kicked his 5 ? month pregnant daughter
(Ashley) in the stomach. He also smashed Ashley’s head into
a door while she was pregnant with my niece. Ashley has requested
that her father “get his gun and shoot (her) in the head.”
Shortly after not completing anger counseling and not participating
in family counseling ordered by the court (due to “Paul being
unable to attend.”), therefore not meeting the requirements
of the court, custody of this baby girl was given back to her mother.
!!!!
Everyone I have spoken with about this agrees that my defenseless
4-year old niece needs to be taken out of the “care”
of this mother and away from these people (the Terjelians). Ashley
needs a lot of help. Her long-term violent behavior clearly shows
that she needs help and that the violence is escalating. I saw it
in her eyes when she came within an inch of my face and screamed
at me. She is filled with rage and anger and has no control over
her behavior. She is aggressive, threatening and violent toward
others, including her own family members such as her sister, brother
and father (this is documented in the several affidavits written
by police over the years). In high school, she caused for another
student to transfer schools because the student was that much afraid
of her. And Ashley is not a small female—even with this recent
weight loss. Ashley has instilled fear in her sister and I’m
sure her brother. Ashley was trying to hurt and/or frighten me,
but I am frightened for my niece.
When Ashley was yelling and screaming wildly in my face in the parking
lot to “get away from my f#$%ing car!”, my niece was
looking frightened and stepped back away from her mother. I asked
Ashley, “Ash--Ashley, do---do you think this type of behavior
is appropriate around a child?” “I don’t care!”
she screamed . “Get away from my car before you make me have
to hurt you!”
Where is the justice for my niece? Where is the justice for my family?
Where is the justice for my brother who has been trapped in the
criminal “justice” system for many years—a person
who has survived and (in my opinion) thrived in spite of many traumatic
experiences. Some of the traumatic experiences he has had to live
through are: 1) being hit by a car giving him a traumatic brain
injury at the age of 8. 2) severe mistreatment (if not outright
abuse by peers and authorities as he grew up with no help or treatment
for behaviors and deficits that were caused by the head injury)
3) a nearly successful suicide attempt via gasoline which resulted
in my parent’s house burning.
[The mounting problems in his life, including being led to believe
(by Paul Terjelian) that his daughter had been aborted, and being
“in trouble” with the law because he slept with an underage
female (who lied to my brother about her age) eventually led him
to make that desperate decision that nearly ended his life.] My
brother is a caring and compassionate person, who is concerned about
helping others and helping our society to become more just and less
violent.
For a time leading up to his suicide attempt, my brother would have
been described by the “authorities” as violent and out-of-control—and
yet help was never given to turn the situation around.
My brother turned his life around through his own will and actions—not
due to any punishment he was given.
Now, my brother is watching as the level of violence, aggression,
and out-of-control behavior of his daughter’s mother continues
to escalate with no intervention from authorities. He wants his
daughter in safe care, and he wants Ashley to get help. However,
until Ashley gets help, she is in no condition to “care”
or even be around a child. She said it herself--she doesn’t
care about her violent behavior around her daughter. She said it
in a violent outburst in front of her daughter on March 10, 2005
and she said she it again, in another outburst of violence that
escalated to the point of someone (me) almost being intentionally
run over by a car driven by Ashley’s violent boyfriend, Robert
Meek
DCF
defines child abuse as: “Abused or neglected child is a child
whose physical health, psychological growth and development or welfare
is harmed or is at substantial risk of harm by the acts or omissions
of his or her parent or other person responsible for the child’s
welfare. Also, a child who is sexually abused or at substantial
risk of sexual abuse by any person (33 VSA &4912 (2)).
(www.dcf.state.vt.us/fsd/policy/50.html)
My niece is an abused child and is at risk of harm. I understand
that DCF has policies. But these policies allow for many children
to continue to be abused because they “don’t meet the
criteria” for an investigation. Our system is one that is
set up that takes action after a tragedy has occurred and after
years of abuse have damaged the child.
As far as signs and symptoms are concerned---they describe behavior
in older children, and do not address the behavior or concerns about
a young child. They intervene AFTER abuse has been allowed to continue
for SEVERAL years.
I am a full time artist and part-time after school art teacher.
I am not a certified teacher, therefore I am not required by law
to report any suspected child abuse or neglect. However, I would
like to think that if a child came to me and trusted to tell me
about some type of abuse that is occurring to them or someone they
know, that I could report this to the appropriate authorities (the
police? DCF?) and trust that it would be investigated appropriately
and accurately. And if abuse was present that the child would be
removed from the abusive situation or the persons causing the abusive
situation would receive long-term, intense treatment until they
had changed their abusive behavior. Unfortunately, I do not have
faith in the system we have set up to help our children or persons
like my brother, who needed help after he was injured at the age
of eight.
Anyone who suspects child abuse should be listened to--especially
a respected and responsible relative who had been a healthy presence
in the child’s life for a period of time and then was inexplicably
kicked out of the child’s life. (One sign that abuse is occurring
is that the child (my niece) is kept isolated from extended family.)
I have been asked by Colchester Police (March 10, 2005) and South
Burlington Police and DCF what I did to cause this violent behavior
in Ashley—what I did to cause Ashley to kick me out of my
niece’s life. What “I did” was to be concerned
about the mother’s behavior around her daughter and ask my
niece how she is doing.
Imagine how you would react in the situation my brother is in. How
would you have reacted when Paul tried to instigate a fight with
you by physically confining and pushing you while you tried to visit
with your daughter? How would you react as you watch the mother
of your daughter (and the mother’s boyfriend) behave in a
violent, aggressive manner that almost hurt or killed someone you
love? How would you react when nothing is done by police authority
about the behavior that could have resulted in your sister’s
injury or death? How would you react knowing that something bad
is happening to your 4 year old daughter and yet, the law---the
police and other authority figures such as judges and probation
officers--- look at you and punish you as if you are the bad guy?
How would you react as the bad decisions by authorities, continue
to subject your daughter to abuse? How would you have reacted on
January 2, 2007 when Judge Crawford said that he does not want to
make a decision about the child, without the mother in court (for
the second time in a row), because he does not want to “place
the child in danger”---insinuating that you (the father) would
provide a dangerous situation for your child---while you know that
the mother is providing a dangerous and abusive environment?
My brother has remained in control of his behavior in spite of all
this. Larkin Forney has gained control over his behavior and turned
his life around. He has been focused and doing excellent in school
and “filing” the appropriate forms with the courts and
agencies to alert them that his daughter is being abused and is
in danger, and that the mother needs serious help. He has remained
in control of his behavior in spite of the fact that he is being
looked at and treated by many in the criminal “justice”
system as a child abuser--something he is not—while being
ignored by those who are in positions to help his abused daughter.
When will justice for my brother and our entire family occur? When
will my niece be taken out of this volatile situation? When will
his name be cleared of the unjust label as a sex offender---a label
he had to “accept” or face arson charges (for his suicide
attempt) and many years (basically his life) in jail. When will
my parents be able to live in peace and feel secure that their son
is being allowed to regain his life, and that their granddaughter
is safe?I pray that my niece remains safe while in this dangerous
situation. I pray that the appropriate power and authorities will
finally remove this little girl out of “harms way”.
I went to the SBPD on Monday January 8, 2007 to write a report about
what had occurred Sunday January 7. I spoke with Officer Mike Henry
about what had occurred. I told him we had a video tape of the whole
incident. He immediately asked me why we had a video tape—which
is not even important—but we had the video camera so that
my mother could record Larkin with his daughter. When this whole
scene started unfolding we used this video camera as a tool, and
also, as protection. (Why would someone harm you or try to harm
you knowing they were being recorded? Why would someone act so out
of control knowing they were being recorded?---because they are
OUT OF CONTROL AND THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT HURTING OTHERS.)
I had not had the video tape with me when I went to write a report
on Monday January 8, 2007, as we wanted to make copies. Officer
Henry told me I could not make copies. When I asked him why, he
said because he needed to make sure the “tape had not been
tampered with.” I brought the tape into him later that day
and he was able to view it on the small screen of the camcorder,
but wanted to view it on a larger screen before he made any decision
about pressing charges. He seemed concerned about Ashley’s
behavior. He kept the tape to make copies. Two weeks later on Monday
January 23, 2007 Officer Henry called my brother and told him, he
was not going to press charges. The reason he gave was something
about it being “mutual”—a mutual attempted assault?
I never agreed to be around Robert Meek. I never agreed to have
Robert Meek verbally assault me and almost hit me with his car.
Officer Henry then said something about “me being in a road”.
And something about me “putting myself in harm’s way.”
In harm’s way? If going to visit with my niece due to my mounting
concerns about her care, means that I am putting myself in harm’s
way, then my niece is in harm’s way.
What happened on Sunday January 7, 2007 almost ended in tragedy.
And I’m certain it was a very traumatic experience for my
4 year old niece. It certainly was for me. The last few weeks have
been tough, and full of many different emotions concerning my niece,
her safety, my safety, my family’s safety. I’m wondering
what “Molly” must be thinking of this whole situation.
She saw me--her aunt--(whom she loves) for the first time in a long
time and saw her mother “flip out” on her aunt…..and
then she saw Robert Meek, her mother’s boyfriend, almost run
her aunt over. Presumably, Ashley called Robert (I wonder what that
conversation was like for “Molly” to hear.) Then they
both chose to drive to Burger King and park their cars in the back
parking lot, waiting for us to leave. What they did is way beyond
wrong. When Ashley initially left with “Molly”, that
would have been the end of it. But she chose to call Robert Meek.
And Robert Meek chose to try to run me over.
Robert Meek drove at a high rate of speed, out of his way, to head
in the direction of where I was standing with the video camera (our
protection and tool to use for this sudden violent attack, and to
record this violent behavior in the presence of my niece. ) My brother
witnessed the whole thing and said that Robert barely missed hitting
me—less than an inch, maybe two. He immediately called 911.
(We are still trying to figure out why SBPD never received a 911
call that day from him. Did it go to the Burlington Police Dept.?)
The 911 call is also recorded on video.
I did not put myself in “harm’s way” as Officer
Henry (according to Leuitenant Lavallee) described it. This was
a deliberate and planned attack on me in front of my 4 year old
niece.
I am “the victim” in this situation. This was not a
“mutual” altercation. They came to where I was. Ashley
threatened to hurt me. Then Ashley’s boyfriend tried to hurt
me.
I am still trying to speak in person with Officer Henry, but the
two days that I went to the SBPD (Monday Jan. 22 and Tuesday Jan
23) he was “unavailable”.
Who do I contact that will take action to get this child to safety?
Please pray (think positive thoughts) for her safety and that the
appropriate action is taken to remove this darling child from this
volatile situation.
Larkin and Ashley have a hearing in family court on Cherry Street
in Burlington Tuesday January 30, 2007 at 9am.
I hope that Judge Crawford will make better judgments and get this
child out of harm’s way—out of the “care”
of this mother who needs A LOT of help to work through her anger
and violent behavior.
My brother has a website that he created. It is: HYPERLINK "http://www.justiceforvermonters.org"
www.justiceforvermonters.org
I would like to say that until we, as a society, start to appropriately
address (or remove) the violence that children are subjected to
in their families, that the violence in our society will continue
to escalate and create damage, devastation and tragedy.
A fact to consider: 75-80% of women in prison have had a TBI (traumatic
brain injury). Most of these injuries were caused by an abusive
partner. We need to stop abuse before it becomes ingrained in a
child’s psyche. We need to stop abuse so that these girls,
who later become women, do not continue the cycle of violence by
choosing an abusive male, and in turn subject their children to
this violence.
Additionally, we need to stop punishing those who have sustained
a brain injury.
This is a large and growing population. Doctors describe it as “the
walking wounded”. Every year, another 2 million people sustain
a brain injury in the U.S. And instead of building centers and putting
our money and resources toward helping them/us, we are building
more prisons to warehouse those who have survived this trauma.
The Wall Street Journal recently (Monday January 8, 2007) had a
huge article about brain injury and how we are still not developing
centers or helping those who are injured in this devastating way.
Insurance does not cover this injury. This growing population continues
to be ignored by law makers, law officials, the criminal justice
system and insurance companies, creating further devastation for
them and their family.
I could have become one of those TBI “survivors” had
Robert hit me with his car. Anyone can become a TBI “survivor”
simply by slipping on some ice. In a fraction of a second, anyone
can have their lives and the lives of their family and friends forever
changed by this injury
My brother is the most extraordinary person that I know.
Please pray for his daughter so that the abuse she is experiencing
and the violence she is surrounded by, ends now.The South Burlington
Police Department has a copy of the video of what occurred on Sunday
January 7, 2007. We have the original tape. I also, have an audio
recording of what took place when I first entered Burger King.
Larkin and Ashley have a hearing in family court on Cherry Street
in Burlington Tuesday January 30, 2007 at 9am.
Ashley Terjelian is due in criminal court on Cherry Street in Burlington
Wednesday January 31, 2007 at 1pm. The charges are domestic assault.
On Larkin’s HYPERLINK "http://www.justiceforvermonters"
www.justiceforvermonters
if you would like to see the type of environment his daughter
is subjected to, read the affidavits under the headings: Terjelian
Violence Continues, CHINS domestic assault ’03, domestic assault
’06.
(If you would like to read other writings regarding TBI and the
injustices surrounding my brother, that I have been doing since
2003, please contact me.)
Kimberlee Forney
P.O. Box 157
Essex Jct., VT 05453
802 893-7503
|
|